arXiv 2605.03257 - Operationalizing SE Theories
Proposes a framework for translating abstract software engineering theories into empirically testable, measurable elements.
Summary
This research paper extends Sjøberg et al.’s operationalization framework to address a persistent gap in software engineering research: the disconnect between theory development and practical empirical validation. The authors argue that SE theories often remain too abstract to be tested rigorously, and propose a structured approach to converting theoretical constructs into measurable indicators.
The framework addresses the socio-technical complexity of modern software engineering, where phenomena involve both technical systems and human/organizational factors. By providing systematic operationalization guidance, the work aims to make SE theories both more rigorous and more useful to practitioners and researchers alike.
The paper positions itself within the broader movement toward evidence-based software engineering, arguing that without proper operationalization, SE theories cannot accumulate empirical support or be falsified, which weakens the field’s scientific foundations.
Key Arguments
- SE theories need systematic operationalization to be practically useful
- Abstract concepts must be converted to measurable indicators before empirical validation is possible
- The framework bridges theory and empirical validation by providing structured translation steps
- Socio-technical complexity in modern SE research requires careful operationalization choices
- Extends Sjøberg et al.’s prior work with additional guidance for complex constructs
Concepts Covered
- Test-Driven Development — empirical validation methods applicable to TDD research
- Quality Attributes — measurable quality as an operationalization target
- Integration Testing — empirical testing approaches as example domain
Quality Notes
Academic research paper; tangential to software architecture but relevant for empirically grounding architectural claims. Most useful when evaluating the evidence base behind architectural practices.